HansF wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:21:05 -0800, blarut wrote:
>
> All you have to do is find the conversion between milliBleem and
> microsecond. Unfortunately, that conversion is variable and is entirely
> dependent on the statement, the database size, the optimizer, the
Now, you can say that, but I distinctly remember my old friend Albert
to mention something about the relativity of all that.
Imagine a parallel universe, and look at a Bleem from the side,
whilst someone else looks at you and the Bleem from the other
side.
The bottom line is, your statement may *seems* to take longer
(and thus making the conversion factor a variable), than mine,
whereas in reality (ok, *what* reality?!?) both statements
take exactly the same amount of R, making Bleem a constant.
All you need to find is the (correct) parallel universe.
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Sat Nov 26 2005 - 07:30:14 CST
