Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

From: JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:58:24 GMT
Message-ID: <1104854304.6ad6a69507d39af81258da46b51d5a34@1usenet>


On 2005-01-03, Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com> wrote:
>> You don't necessarily have to go running to the vendor
>>everytime something goes wrong. Infact, it's better if you don't
>>have to. Vendor response times can vary and you really don't
>>want to be depending on that.
>
>
> Depends on the "you." For a gross overgeneralization, what I've seen
> in places that decide to do things themselves to save on recurring

     Well, nothing can really save you from an organization that insists on subjecting you to 7 year old hand-me-down DLT drives.

> support fees, everything goes fine for a year or three, then it all
> goes to hell as the cumulative lack of preventive maintenance finally
> tsunamis. Like no one remembering to check when the batteries in the
> UPS were installed. Or employee turnover. Or suddenly discovering
> that O7 don't work no more.

[deletia]

-- 
	
                                                                  |||
	                                                         / | \



                                                     
Received on Tue Jan 04 2005 - 09:58:24 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US