Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

On 2004-12-31, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.databases.oracle.server.]
>> On 2004-12-29, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>jeff_vosburg_at_aliases.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>If price is not an issue, which is a better solution to
>>>>use? Oracle 10g w/Automated Storage Manager or Veritas's
>>>>Enterprise Storage Foundation (with clustered filesystem).
>>>>
>>>>Big disadvantage I see to ASM is that we can only use
>>>>raw volumes & depend entirely on RMAN for backups/restores.
>>>>
>>>>This is for 3 Sun v440's that hope to run Oralce 10g RAC.
>>>>
>>>>-JV
>>>
>>>If something goes wrong would you rather have two different
>>
>>
>> If something goes wrong, then you've already lost.
>>
>> The idea should be to avoid something going wrong to begin with.
>
> And when, in the real world, you achieve that no doubt you will
> receive international recognition. The rest of us keep opening
> TARs.
>
> Of all the laws ever made by man ... Murphy's is still the supreme rule.

        Odd then that you don't seem to apply this to Oracle Corp.

        A great many problems can be avoided or minimized by simply applying skepticism in a fair and evenhanded manner.

-- 
	
                                                                  |||
	                                                         / | \