Joel Garry wrote:
> Sybrand Bakker wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:51:30 GMT, JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
>
> wrote:
>
>>> If something goes wrong, then you've already lost.
>>>
>>> The idea should be to avoid something going wrong to begin with.
>>
>>Amen to that!!!
>>
>>Finally someone who understands what it is all about.
>
>
> So does that mean things are more likely to go wrong with one vendor v.
> two, or not?
>
> Or things are more likely to go wrong converting from a system that
> doesn't even use RMAN, or not?
>
> How can you possibly avoid things going wrong whatever you do? Mr.
> Murphy took up residence in a customers' computer room on Monday -
> batteries in UPS decided to pick just before year-end processing to
> start smelling like a sewer and cause the machines to bounce like the
> toilet tank ball in a Tijuana bar. I guess Murphy musta been too
> partied out to come in over the weekend.
>
Mr Murphy is an optimist.
--
A prosperous 2005,
Frank van Bortel
Received on Fri Dec 31 2004 - 03:49:36 CST
