Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

From: Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: 30 Dec 2004 15:00:09 -0800
Message-ID: <1104447609.709849.231030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

Sybrand Bakker wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 19:51:30 GMT, JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
wrote:
>
> > If something goes wrong, then you've already lost.
> >
> > The idea should be to avoid something going wrong to begin with.
>
> Amen to that!!!
>
> Finally someone who understands what it is all about.

So does that mean things are more likely to go wrong with one vendor v. two, or not?

Or things are more likely to go wrong converting from a system that doesn't even use RMAN, or not?

How can you possibly avoid things going wrong whatever you do? Mr. Murphy took up residence in a customers' computer room on Monday - batteries in UPS decided to pick just before year-end processing to start smelling like a sewer and cause the machines to bounce like the toilet tank ball in a Tijuana bar. I guess Murphy musta been too partied out to come in over the weekend.

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
Worms are for wimps:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041230/news_1n30mezcal.html
Received on Thu Dec 30 2004 - 17:00:09 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US