Re: Oracle 10g (ASM vs Veritas Clustered FS)

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:00:30 -0800
Message-ID: <41d49580$1_2@127.0.0.1>

JEDIDIAH wrote:

> ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.databases.oracle.server.]
> On 2004-12-29, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
> 

>>jeff_vosburg_at_aliases.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If price is not an issue, which is a better solution to
>>>use? Oracle 10g w/Automated Storage Manager or Veritas's
>>>Enterprise Storage Foundation (with clustered filesystem).
>>>
>>>Big disadvantage I see to ASM is that we can only use
>>>raw volumes & depend entirely on RMAN for backups/restores.
>>>
>>>This is for 3 Sun v440's that hope to run Oralce 10g RAC.
>>>
>>>-JV
>>
>>If something goes wrong would you rather have two different

> 
> 
> 	If something goes wrong, then you've already lost.
> 
> 	The idea should be to avoid something going wrong to begin with.

And when, in the real world, you achieve that no doubt you will receive international recognition. The rest of us keep opening TARs.

Of all the laws ever made by man ... Murphy's is still the supreme rule.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

Received on Thu Dec 30 2004 - 18:00:30 CST