Re: RAID 5 vs RAID 10 benchmark

From: IANAL_VISTA <IANAL_Vista_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:48:16 GMT
Message-ID: <Xns95AC45383304CSunnySD@68.6.19.6>

janik_at_pobox.sk (Jan) wrote in
news:81511301.0411250222.496c1242_at_posting.google.com:

> Several scientific (or logical) conclussions were already made about
> RAID 5
> that this is not the best option for write intensive databases. It
> seems very logical also to me when I read arguments against RAID 5.
>
> But I`m confused by following benchmark showing that it is not
> worthful anymore (at least for a tested storage) to thinks about RAID
> 5 vs RAID 10 from the performance point of view.
>
> http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/ess/pdf/raid5-raid10.pdf
>
> Jan

http://www.baarf.com/ Received on Thu Nov 25 2004 - 08:48:16 CST