fitzjarrell_at_cox.net (David Fitzjarrell) wrote in message news:<9711ade0.0408141817.341c55a9_at_posting.google.com>...
> "omlet" <notrolls_at_notrolls.omlet.org.notrolls> wrote in message news:<716fc3aafefe2c796d134e7794bf86de_at_localhost.talkaboutdatabases.com>...
> > Opt for a script-less world! Leave the monitoring for the profs!
> >
>
> Take your own advice and leave the monitoring to the professionals who
> know what they are doing. You'll be much better off, and so will we.
>
> > Get a copy of OMLET now! or be sqaured. "There ain't no SQL now near here
> > now you hear"
> >
>
> That is an interesting statement. You're saying you have absolutely
> NO SQL queries hitting any database you monitor. If that is true, why
> do you 'need' copies of many of the x$ views, duplicating data already
> found in the database? Would not synonyms suffice? Or are synonyms
> not 'professional' enough for you? Your omlet$ views add nothing to
> the values found in the corresponding x$ views, so why do you create
> them? I tried your OMLET, with your views and with synonyms in place
> of them and found no difference in performance. Of course, there
> wasn't much in the way of performance to begin with. But I did prove
> your omlet$ views worthless to the application. I can only imagine
> they are the fruit of arrogance and necessary for your
> self-importance. But, that should be obvious to all who have read
> your posts.
>
> Oh, I've since trashed your OMLET as worthless. As have many others
> who have downloaded it and found it disappointing at best.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Oh, no! Why do you hate me so much?
Lilly
Received on Sun Aug 15 2004 - 05:05:03 CDT
