Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: shre lock vs. exclusive lock

Re: shre lock vs. exclusive lock

From: Michel Cadot <micadot{at}altern{dot}org>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:59:52 +0200
Message-ID: <406ed157$0$19462$626a14ce@news.free.fr>

"Ryan Gaffuri" <rgaffuri_at_cox.net> a écrit dans le message de news:1efdad5b.0404030603.32dcd24_at_posting.google.com...
> I am reading a standard university database textbook and I am
> attempting to apply it to Oracle. Here is the book... it's used all
> over the place
>
>
>

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0072554819/qid=1081000904/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-1148263-1387019?v=glance&s=books
>
>
> In the chapter on Locking it states that a share lock is used to lock
> on reads, so that other sessions can read, but cannot right. An
> exclusive lock is used on writes and no other session can access the
> data.
>
> Now oracle doesn't lock on reads and when it does writes, other uses
> can still read. So how does Oracle define share locks vs. exclusive
> locks in contrast to my book?
>
> Oracle's new search feature on metalink is hideous. I'd assume it's
> there, but I can't find it.

About 30 seconds to find this on tahiti, its search engine is great:

http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96524/c21cnsis.htm#2881

Regards
Michel Cadot Received on Sat Apr 03 2004 - 08:59:52 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US