Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Another Oracle "Myth"?

Another Oracle "Myth"?

From: Geomancer <pharfromhome_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 20 Nov 2003 18:53:02 -0800
Message-ID: <cf90fb89.0311201853.126b1516@posting.google.com>


Cary Millsap makes the assertion that a buffer hit ratio of > 99% OFTEN indicates inefficient SQL:

http://www.hotsos.com/dnloads/1.Millsap2001.02.26-CacheRatio.pdf

According to Mr. Millsap:

"A hit ratio in excess of 99% often indicates the existence of extremely inefficient SQL that robs your system's LIO capacity."

With 30 gigabyte data buffer becoming more common and RAM caches approaching 100% for small systems, I wonder if it is true that a 99.9% data buffer hit ratio is due to high caching of frequently referenced objects than some mysterous un-tuned SQL.

To me, this does not make any sense, because many well-tuned systems benefit from additional RAM. The v$db_cache_advice view was introduced in 9i for this very reason.

Is this another Myth, or am I missing something? Received on Thu Nov 20 2003 - 20:53:02 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US