Re: ORACLE or SQL SERVER (MS) ?

From: Guinness Mann <GMann_at_dublin.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:40:35 -0700
Message-ID: <MPG.1a006efc1e1f271f989711@news.newsguy.com>

In article <j0jlb.41302$Sc7.7924_at_twister.nyroc.rr.com>, "Greg D. Moore $Strider$" <mooregr_at_greenms.com> says...
> And the developer's edition [of SQL Server 2000]
> is now fairly cheap as I recall.

Fifty bucks for the full (developer's license) enterprise edition of SQL Server 2000. Less, I think if you get it from a reseller. Great deal.

Now if they only had a developer's license edition of Windows Server 2003...

Rick

Received on Wed Oct 22 2003 - 12:40:35 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: WebYourCompany: "Re: Optimal size for Redo Logs?"
Previous message: colinlyse: "Is imp/exp the best way to move one schema from one inst to another? Please help!"
In reply to: Greg D. Moore $Strider$: "Re: ORACLE or SQL SERVER (MS) ?"
Next in thread: Daniel Morgan: "Re: ORACLE or SQL SERVER (MS) ?"
Reply: Daniel Morgan: "Re: ORACLE or SQL SERVER (MS) ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US