Re: Oracle's Myth: keep tables and indexes in separate tablespaces

Jack wrote:

>
> Look Howard what You did say at 23 Jun 2002 :
> LOL
> ------------------------------------------------
> From: "Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com>
> Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
> Subject: Re: Basic question on RAID array / Tablespace configuration.
> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 00:33:46 +1000
>
> There is precisely zero benefit in separating tables from their indexes
> for performance reasons. Both are segments. Just like Table A and Table B
> are both segments. Separate A from B by all means, but unless you're
> consistent, there's no point in separating a table from its index.
>
>
> Regards
> HJR
I'm missing your point Jack.

Yes those were my views in 2002. They've been my views for a long, long time.

So how does that add weight to your argument that Oracle's official position is the same as mine?

Or are you suggesting that when I wrote those words I was doing so as a representative of Oracle? If so, that won't fly. I've never posted here as an official Oracle representative.

My views are and have always been mine alone.

Regards
HJR

-- 
--------------------------------------------
See my brand new website, soon to be full of 
new articles: www.dizwell.com.
Nothing much there yet, but give it time!!
--------------------------------------------