Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Clustering: RAC vs FailSafe
I think you're mixing up products
- Oracle RAC : parallel server implementation - concurrent access - does not
*need* archivelogging - but of course you'll
need it for hot backup's
- FailSafe : Oracle software on top of Win2000 cluster software to make
*some* Oracle products cluster aware (take-over cluster that is) - to my
knowledge does not *need* archivelogging - but again, you'll need it for hot
backup's
- Oracle Dataguard : disaster recovery framework : *needs* archivelogging
for logshipping to standby databases
"Charles M. Goehring" <cgoehrin_at_san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:q8qedv03em6hrnq4igdjraks0hvgo9134p_at_4ax.com...
>
>
>
> We are covered by a site license for 9i and RAC and will be running on
> Windows 2000 Advanced Sever. Hardware is Dell with a Dell SCSI RAID
> box. The system includes Apache Web Server and Apache Tomcat.
>
>
>
> Deciding on RAC vs FailSafe and have several unanswered questions:
>
> Can both be operated without having to use Archive Log mode? I
> thought FailSafe was based on using this, but now I'm not sure.
>
>
> Is RAC Guard a separate product or is it included with RAC? I
> can't find it listed as a separate product on the Oracle Web site.
>
> Help is greatly appreciated
> Chuck
Received on Sat May 31 2003 - 09:36:02 CDT