No suggestions, but I share your concern. It makes no sense to me either.
A correlated sub-query should have correct syntax (that includes valid
columnnames from the table used), but Oracle apparently doesn't think so.
--
Terry Dykstra
Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.
"Paul Brewer" <paul_at_paul.brewers.org.uk> wrote in message
news:3d2b5197_1_at_mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com...
> "Daniel Morgan" <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
> news:3D2B4AEA.EF7D9D1_at_exesolutions.com...
> > And your concept of what a correlated sub-query should do is ...?
> >
> I didn't find this post particularly helpful.
> Still looking for suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 09 2002 - 17:10:55 CDT
