Daniel,
I'm not sure. What did you have for lunch last Wednesday? :-)
Jim
"Daniel A. Morgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
news:3CC1EF65.C218F599_at_exesolutions.com...
> If you want benchmarks then look at the recent study published by one of
> the major computer rags, I forget which one because I think all benchmarks
> are nonsense. They rated Oracle first and MySQL second. SQL Server barely
> made it onto the radar screen.
>
> But benchmarks are about as relevant to picking a SQL RDBMS as is what I
> had for lunch last Wednesday. The important issues are security,
> stability, and scalability. If it isn't secure, stable, and scalable who
> gives a flying donut how fast it falls apart.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
>
>
> Isaac Keslassy wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to use a database with about 10 Gbytes and 25 million
> > lines. This would be via Intranet (IIS server).
> >
> > Would you know where I could find results of benchmark tests comparing
> > the performances of SQL server vs. Oracle with a similar database?
> > (answer speed, memory needed, etc.)
> > Given your experience, what would be the main pros and cons for each
> > solution?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Isaac
>
Received on Sun Apr 21 2002 - 11:56:35 CDT
