Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Odd statement in docs regarding block size

Re: Odd statement in docs regarding block size

From: Steffen Ramlow <as.ramlow_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:21:09 +0200
Message-ID: <a8n3qp$suamf$1@ID-54600.news.dfncis.de> 





"Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com> wrote in message
news:a8ko11$5pg$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...


> This is the same documentation that says SYSTEM can be created locally

> managed, which is only true of 9i release 2. I wouldn't therefore pay it

too


> much attention on this issue; it is simply wrong if it implies 8K is the

> only permitted block size on NT. I do 16K every time.




hm, shoudn't the ora block size not always be equal to the os block size?
Received on Sat Apr 06 2002 - 09:21:09 CST












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US