In article <a8n3qp$suamf$1_at_ID-54600.news.dfncis.de>, "Steffen says...
>
>"Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com> wrote in message
>news:a8ko11$5pg$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...
>> This is the same documentation that says SYSTEM can be created locally
>> managed, which is only true of 9i release 2. I wouldn't therefore pay it
>too
>> much attention on this issue; it is simply wrong if it implies 8K is the
>> only permitted block size on NT. I do 16K every time.
>
>hm, shoudn't the ora block size not always be equal to the os block size?
>
>
no, a multiple of, not the same as. many os's do 512bytes for example.
--
Thomas Kyte (tkyte@us.oracle.com) http://asktom.oracle.com/
Expert one on one Oracle, programming techniques and solutions for Oracle.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1861004826/
Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle Corp
Received on Sat Apr 06 2002 - 10:20:46 CST
