Re: [8i] redo logs

Igor Laletin doodled thusly:

>
>Frederic can't create a file with the same _name_ which means either
>oracle still has it in the data dictionary or file is still in the
>filesystem.
>
>> > I've a very little problem with my Oracle 8.1.7 database :
>> > I had to resize my 3 redo log files, so I created 3 new redo logs,
>> > with datafiles numbered from 4 to 6 and drop the tree old ones. Then I
>> > removed the files corresponding to old redo logs.
>> > I then decided to create three others redo logs numbered from 1 to 3.
>> > And I couldn't because Oracle said me they already existed.
>> > Is this a normal comportement or did I forget anything ?

Could this be Frederic deleted only one side of the redo log group?

Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam Received on Wed Mar 27 2002 - 03:02:50 CST