Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Performance question: single datafile vs multiple datafiles

Re: Performance question: single datafile vs multiple datafiles

From: Ricky Sanchez <rsanchez_at_more.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 18:28:10 GMT
Message-ID: <3C7FC86B.82DAC24D@more.net>


Sybrand-

How does file size relate to dbwr average scan depth?

Also, in a non-raid environment, don't multiple data files afford the opportunity to spread IO among many disks and reduce latency?

Sybrand Bakker wrote:
>
> On 28 Feb 2002 07:50:12 -0800, dub_at_latnet.lv (Dub) wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >What is better from performance point of view - to extend existing
> >single datafile or to add one more datafile?
> >
> >Assume I use the same physical disk.
> >
> >Any suggestions/links will be highly appreciated.
> >
> >BR,
> >Dub
>
> Apart from hitting the 2G limit, there is no reason to have multiple
> datafiles for a single tablespace on the same physical disk.
> It doesn't buy you anything apart from complaints about a too high
> dbwr_average_scan_depth.
>
> Regards
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
> To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Fri Mar 01 2002 - 12:28:10 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US