Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: How closely do you adhere to OFA standards? e.g. arch directory?

Re: How closely do you adhere to OFA standards? e.g. arch directory?

From: Terry Sutton <terrysutton_at_usa.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:26:00 GMT
Message-ID: <YsXe8.19210$ZC3.1583160@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>


Rick,

You definitely should consider contention issues when you decide where you place your archive logs. But wherever you place them, you don't need to violate OFA standards. You just place a symbolic link from the directory the archive logs are in to $ORACLE_BASE/admin/arch. That way, anyone (or any script) who understands OFA will be able to find your archive logs immediately.

--Terry

> Another view is that the archived redo log files should be separated from
> the common mount point (i.e. ORACLE_BASE) that it shares with the product
> software. Are there enough benefits that warrants separating them out?
> That arrangement would deviate from the OFA standard.
>
> Aside from the mount point dedicated for data, does it matter from a
> contention issue where the archived redo log files go (i.e. the non-data
> mount point vs its own unique mount point)? Is a unique mount point just
> for archived redo log files overkill? As long as there's sufficient
space,
> should the arch directory remain in its location according to the
standard?
> Are there any implications if not complying with the OFA standards?
Received on Tue Feb 26 2002 - 20:26:00 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US