Re: OUI pack

To answer your question, "no".

I have to wonder why it is that installations seem to cause so much grief. I've never yet had a problem, and I've been installing onto NT and W2K and XP for a while now (like 3 years or so). Can't say I've ever had to poke around with JREs, either. The Pentium 4 doesn't help (there are known issues, and a search in metalink or the google archives for this news group will help reveal what they are), but there are workarounds.

HJR

--
----------------------------------------------
Resources for Oracle: http://www.hjrdba.com
===============================

"Opi" <opi_at_volny.cz> wrote in message news:9vn65j$5a7$1_at_ns.felk.cvut.cz...


> Hi,

>

> It's likely that somebody has made Oracle Universal Installer, standalone

or


> how to call it, I mean such distribution of the OUI alone, AND, WITH ALL

> PATCHES!!!

> Don't tell me that NOBODY of several thousands Oracle's employees is able

to


> take the newest OUI, rename all the stuff that needs to (genial 'patch',

to


> rename some dll, i wish my programs worked so!, then what is the dll good

> for at all?)

>    Well I have tried Oracle8 PE + W98, Oracle8 PE + W2000, Oracle8 EE +

> W2000, everything combined with JRE 1.2.2, 1.3.1, JDK 1.3.1, original JRE,

> guess what? All the same - either invalid oparation (wow, W2000 doesn't

give


> any hint what happened - just kills it - what a great idea, who needs to

> know what happend, thanks, M$!) or some java screen with a picture, maybe

> intended as an veryveryveryveryvery inteligent instalation interface, but

it


> disappears almost before it appears, and the only way to spot it was to

> attach it to the VC6's debugger.

>    HEY you, who invented 'Java distribution approach', don't blame me, my

> java programs run correctly. That's you who is impotent to lop down and

> write an exe file to install a program. Or are you? Ok, back to the topic.

>

> Is there any two-step Oracle installer, just to download and run, doesn't

> matter if GUI or console? And runs on Pentium4 (and further processors as

> well)? And doesn't contain a bit of Java at the best? And is not needed to

> be patched milion times? Pleease... I lost whole one week trying to

install


> Oracle, but probably I'm not allowed by God to success. I'm really in

hurry,


> got 28 days to get it work and to write a bussines application based on

it.


> Still I hope it's (theoretically) possible.

>

> Thanks, Ondra

>

>