Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: changing rollbacks

Re: changing rollbacks

From: <ganszky_at_my-deja.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 18:24:02 GMT
Message-ID: <7ipbc2$er1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>


Hi Doug,

have You tried a coalesce on the tablespace?

Regards

Ralph Ganszky

In article <374EE970.1164527_at_bigfoot.com>,   Doug Cowles <dcowles_at_bigfoot.com> wrote:
> I could be just tired - but somthing's bugging me. I have three
> rollbacks,
> intitially sized at 70M on datafiles of 1.5 GB each. One tablespace
per
>
> datafile, and one rollback segment for each tablespace. Nothing else
in
>
> the tablespaces but their respective rollbacks.
>
> I wanted to change the intial size of the three rollbacks to 300M, and
> then
> shrink the datafiles to 600M. I dropped the three rollbacks, (which I
> thought
> would clear out the datafiles completely), and then recreated them
with
> the new
> storage parameters. When I try to shrink the datafiles to 600M, it
> tells me
> , ORA-03297: file contains 641 blocks of data beyond the requested
> RESIZE value.
>
> Now, it's Friday, and I'm leaving this one, but instinct tells me if I
> re-create the
> tablespace, everything will be dandy.. but how can this happen? If
I've
> dropped any
> segments that are in that tablespace, corresponding to a rollback
> segment whose
> high water mark never exceeded 300M, why would there be data or
> allocated extents
> floating around the 600M mark??
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Dc.
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't. Received on Sat May 29 1999 - 13:24:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US