Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Pro-C Question - Any Ideas?

Re: Pro-C Question - Any Ideas?

From: Dan McNaul <danmcnaul_at_rcn.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 07:49:10 -0400
Message-ID: <7f1vbh$rjm$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>


I solved this by using sqlald() and malloc to do my own memory management for SELECT LIST columns. Not the easiest thing to maintain, but it does work.

McNaul

Dan McNaul wrote in message <7etqcn$1k7$1_at_autumn.news.rcn.net>...
>Hi,
>
>I have a Pro-C program that runs under a flavor of UNIX. The program
>initializes by connecting to Oracle and stays connected until the program
is
>signaled to stop. The program does the following when a phone call
arrives.
>
>It creates a dynamic SQL statement.
>It PREPAREs the SQL statement
>It DECLARES a CURSOR for the SQL stmt
>It OPENs the CURSOR
>It FETCHes the rows returning the specified rows (and stores them in a
>linked list)
>It CLOSEs the CURSOR
>
>
>Everything works fine on the first phone call and returns the appropriate
>information.
>
>On the second phone call, however, the program successfully calls PREPARE,
>DECLARE, and OPEN (zero sqlca.sqlcode).
>But when the program executes the FETCH the program dumps core in the
Oracle
>function sqlcex(). I think
>it is related to the fact that the variables in the program still contain
>residual data from the first phone call. I have
>taken special care to make sure my (non-Oracle) variables are
reinitialized.
>Have any of you seen this behavior before?
>Does anyone have an idea of what I should do about it?
>
>Thanks
>
>McNaul
>
Received on Wed Apr 14 1999 - 06:49:10 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US