In article <77lh14$fag$1_at_mendelevium.btinternet.com>,
"Finn Ellebaek Nielsen" <fen_at_changegroup.dk> wrote:
> Oracle actually has stated that performance of SQLJ or Java with JDBC is
> slower than PL/SQL with database intensive applications. On the other hand
> Java is faster than PL/SQL for compute intensive applications.
>
> Paul S wrote in message <369ff2e3.515079314_at_news.cix.co.uk>...
> >No, I don't believe so. On the replacement side of things, you forget
> >that SQLJ is still simply a wrapper to server DB scripts, in that that
> >makes calls to PL/SQL / SQL code. So I think PL/SQL is here to stay.
> >Lets hope Oracle PL/SQL objects in the future has polymorphism, then
> >SQLJ may have a run for its money.
> >
> >Kind Regards
> >Paul Scott
> >aspscott_at_tcp.co.uk
> >^^ remove 'as' anti-spam prefix to E-mail
> >
>
>
I can only hope that Java will replace PL/SQL and not VB or Active/X.
Mladen Gogala
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Received on Thu Jan 14 1999 - 19:50:31 CST
