Oracle actually has stated that performance of SQLJ or Java with JDBC is
slower than PL/SQL with database intensive applications. On the other hand
Java is faster than PL/SQL for compute intensive applications.
Paul S wrote in message <369ff2e3.515079314_at_news.cix.co.uk>...
>No, I don't believe so. On the replacement side of things, you forget
>that SQLJ is still simply a wrapper to server DB scripts, in that that
>makes calls to PL/SQL / SQL code. So I think PL/SQL is here to stay.
>Lets hope Oracle PL/SQL objects in the future has polymorphism, then
>SQLJ may have a run for its money.
>
>Kind Regards
>Paul Scott
>aspscott_at_tcp.co.uk
>^^ remove 'as' anti-spam prefix to E-mail
>
Received on Thu Jan 14 1999 - 13:36:50 CST
