Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Oracle IAS java process forms 6i memory issue on AIX?

Re: Oracle IAS java process forms 6i memory issue on AIX?

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:39:51 +0200
Message-ID: <f9ejsm$i10$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

peter.glover_at_dsl.pipex.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find anyone that can advise on an issue I've observered
> on one of my AIX servers BTW I'm a unix admin and not an Oracle
> guru ). The issue appears to be an Oracle process which is the parent
> of all the forms process f60runm when the total of the parent and the
> child processes reaching near 8GB it falls over and regenerates on a
> new process. I'm guessing that the process is unable to address memory
> over 8GB and so causes an illegal memory address and needs to restart.
>
> I'm hoping this can be fixed by either a parameter or an OS change
> ( setting ) anyone have a similar issue or have any hints?
>
> The process in question is detailed below and looking at svmon is
> running in 32bit mode
> root 10084478 9519266 2 13:05:49 - 12:00 /usr/java_dev2/
> jre/sh/../bi
> n/java -mx256M -Dorg.omg.CORBA.ORBClass=com.visigenic.vbroker.orb.ORB -
> Dorg.omg.
> CORBA.ORBSingletonClass=com.visigenic.vbroker.orb.ORB
> org.apache.jserv.JServ -op
> mpropfile /ias/Apache/Jserv/etc/jserv.properties -opmhost MTSLIVE -
> opmport 3339
> -opmgrp group1 -opmindex 0 -opmprocid 15
>
>
> The kernel is running in 64bit mode so no reason why this app couldn't
> address more memory. the -mx flag looks interesting ?
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Peter
>

The mx flag defines HEAP memory (-mx256m: 256M maximum heap).

All the other stuff is 32 bit, and your forms version could do with an update - later versions dumped the CORBA stuff.

And there's this: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4720694 Not sure if that applies

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFGutLXLw8L4IAs830RAv3TAJ9la0TR72zZweU4wmsL+NoD52G7/ACgkNl6 ZY2Y0Be9eFgNeUT9eZZC9dY=
=eTx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Received on Thu Aug 09 2007 - 03:39:51 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US