Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: SAME document from ORACLE (similiar to OFA)

Re: SAME document from ORACLE (similiar to OFA)

From: Ted <ted_oatway_at_storagetek.com>
Date: 15 Jan 2002 13:16:39 -0800
Message-ID: <b60b9d79.0201151316.6fa6cd04@posting.google.com>


I do not have access to Metalink which is why I posted this request here. If you have the SAME document I would appreciate a copy of it. If you do not want to personally send it to me, would you please direct me to someone who may be able to send it to me.

Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message news:<dbp64u8q1im71cbuifbfsj79hl6p9n8ida_at_4ax.com>...
> On 14 Jan 2002 13:59:17 -0800, ted_oatway_at_storagetek.com (Ted) wrote:
>
> >About six months or so ago I read a document called System
> >Architecture Methodology (SAME) or something like that. I thought it
> >was published by Oracle. It discussed the requirements for laying out
> >an Oracle database across a number of large RAID5 LUNs. Specifically
> >it discussed striping the indexes and database files across the same
> >LUNs.
> >
> >I don't want to get into a discussion of RAID5 vs. RAID10. With small
> >databases and bigger disks there just are not enough spindles to go
> >around but I would like to know if anyone has seen this document or
> >can point me to similiar material.
>
> It can be found on Metalink. It doesn't however necessarily endorse
> RAID5.
> As you evidently are a representative of a disk vendor, it would be
> better you work together with Oracle on this, instead of asking
> questions in a public newsgroup.
>
> Hth
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
> To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Tue Jan 15 2002 - 15:16:39 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US