Re: SAME document from ORACLE (similiar to OFA)

It is available on otn at
http://otn.oracle.com/deploy/performance/pdf/opt_storage_conf.pdf

You need to register, but it is free.

HTH
  James

In article <b60b9d79.0201151316.6fa6cd04_at_posting.google.com>, Ted <ted_oatway_at_storagetek.com> wrote:

> I do not have access to Metalink which is why I posted this request
> here. If you have the SAME document I would appreciate a copy of it.
> If you do not want to personally send it to me, would you please
> direct me to someone who may be able to send it to me.
>
> Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
> news:<dbp64u8q1im71cbuifbfsj79hl6p9n8ida_at_4ax.com>...
> > On 14 Jan 2002 13:59:17 -0800, ted_oatway_at_storagetek.com (Ted) wrote:
> >
> > >About six months or so ago I read a document called System
> > >Architecture Methodology (SAME) or something like that. I thought it
> > >was published by Oracle. It discussed the requirements for laying out
> > >an Oracle database across a number of large RAID5 LUNs. Specifically
> > >it discussed striping the indexes and database files across the same
> > >LUNs.
> > >
> > >I don't want to get into a discussion of RAID5 vs. RAID10. With small
> > >databases and bigger disks there just are not enough spindles to go
> > >around but I would like to know if anyone has seen this document or
> > >can point me to similiar material.
> >
> > It can be found on Metalink. It doesn't however necessarily endorse
> > RAID5.
> > As you evidently are a representative of a disk vendor, it would be
> > better you work together with Oracle on this, instead of asking
> > questions in a public newsgroup.
> >
> > Hth
> >
> > Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
> >
> > To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Wed Jan 16 2002 - 10:46:13 CST