Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: Disregard - got my answer

Re: Disregard - got my answer

From: Okana <Okana_at_email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 12:53:46 -0700
Message-ID: <e0tvHP8o#GA.115@cpmsnbbsa02>


Disregard - I have my answer -

Okana <Okana_at_email.msn.com> wrote in message news:uP0ku16o#GA.274_at_cpmsnbbsa02...
> VB5
> Oracle 8.4 and 8.5
> ADO
>
> I use an Update SQL statement and execute the command. (I do not open a
> recordset) The only way I have found to update date fields in this manner
> is to pass the string configuration (dd-mmm-yy) in the update statement.
>
> Problem - Dates passed this way are being evaluated wrong when they hit
> Oracle - 2003 now becomes 1903, etc. I thought that Y2K compliance
standard
> dictated that any two digit year less than 35 be automatically evaluated
as
> 20xx. Oracle is not doing it this way. (Stupid assumption on my part)
>
> So - my big question is, if I do an update SQL statement is there a way to
> pass a date value with a four digit year in the statement or am I going to
> have to open recordsets to update any date to assure Y2K compliance?
>
> And as a side note - why is Oracle8 not Y2K compliant in this area?
>
> Michael Milliron
> mikem_at_msamail.com
> okana_at_msn.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Fri May 21 1999 - 14:53:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US