Re: Performance stats retention

From: Pap <oracle.developer35_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 11:53:51 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEjw_fhZ+0BVGDRng6khnSs4den6P=8LxCfccyzUmcMESOzU7g_at_mail.gmail.com>



If you see page no- 245 in the doc below, it does state that you can alter the metricHistoryDays using the command " alter cell metricHistoryDays='<N>'".

https://www.oswoug.org/OSWOUG/Home_files/expert_oracle_exadata_second_edition.pdf

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 1:49 AM Lok P <loknath.73_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Listers, In many of our customer databases(combination of Version
> 11.2 and 19C) we have daily and monthend processes runs and that is why we
> normally set the AWR retention period to >65 days to have visibility for
> the last two months back activity , so as to look into any performance
> issues and compare things back in days.It is helping us significantly in
> triaging production issues. Though these AWR data were consuming storage
> space on sysaux tablespace but we have not seen any performance issue as
> such because of this. We have been asked to do the same for cell metrics
> too by increasing the retention i.e. 'metrichistorydays' parameter.
> Currently it default 7days. So wanted to understand from experts here ,
> 1)If this will have any negative impacts? 2) How will these metrics be
> different from the ones displayed in the AWR report? As because in AWR
> report we do see the exadata cell flash cache, disk related stats all the
> way back till we have the set awr retention period i.e.>65days(even we
> have metrichistorydays set as default 7 days ).
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Lok
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Feb 08 2022 - 07:23:51 CET

Original text of this message