Re: Statistics of the Oracle version used in percent

From: Niklas Iveslatt <niklas.iveslatt_at_arisant.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 16:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHLzPNeOWuDb4LEWrPrC+Q=hcmZu2fErx0dVMTNcROC31OwSvQ_at_mail.gmail.com>



Here is an unsophisticated, off-the-cuff, and completely non-sanctioned guestimate of the situation purely based on my limited view of the Oracle DB universe - sort of if this was a trivia question, my answer would be this:

7 - <1%
8i - 3%
9i - 7%

10g - 10%
11g -  15%
12c -  35%
18c -  5%

19c - 25%

Niklas Iveslatt
Senior Partner

Arisant LLC ~ http://www.arisant.com
383 Inverness Parkway, Suite 175 ~ Englewood, CO 80112 mobile: 303.882.4461 ~ main: 303.330.4065 ~ fax: 888.889.0155

  Need to send me something securely? *Click here* <https://arisant.sendsafely.com/u/niklas.iveslatt>

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 3:21 PM Clay Jackson <dmarc-noreply_at_freelists.org> wrote:

> Amen on the gate/test/whatever you want to call it.
>
>
>
> At every shop I worked in, we had SOME sort of “test suite” that we
> applied to ANY Quarterly Update, Release or major patch that we got from
> Oracle; which is why we were usually 2 month behind on the Quarterly
> patches. I can’t count the number of “issues” those suites uncovered,
> and the list is full of “We applied this patch/update/release and (some
> critical SQL) performance went sideways”.
>
>
>
> There are lots of ways to do that, from several different vendors,
> including Oracle Real Application Testing.
>
>
>
> Clay
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Mark W. Farnham
> *Sent:* Friday, August 6, 2021 2:07 PM
> *To:* Clay Jackson (cjackson) <Clay.Jackson_at_quest.com>;
> ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de; 'list, oracle' <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Statistics of the Oracle version used in percent
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Well said. Those are great reasons for moving forward.
>
>
>
> As a gate, a test suite or “regression test” that key features still
> worked correctly and that any plan degradations were either still within
> performance tolerance or had a count of underflowing performance
> requirements that could be handled was also useful.
>
>
>
> Larry put it extremely well when he answered why the first release of
> Oracle that was sold was “Version 2.” ( “We knew no one would want to buy
> version 1”.)
>
>
>
> Good luck. I don’t believe you will be able to get a reliable report of
> the percentage of each version and patch release in use. I write this with
> some confidence that enough sites are prohibited by confidentiality and
> security requirements from answering such questions to make any report of
> versions in use reliable.
>
>
>
> And very likely any report from Oracle Marketing is correlated with
> percentage of licensees making some use of the latest release.
>
>
>
> Again, good luck.
>
>
>
> mwf
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [
> mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Clay Jackson (Redacted sender "Clay.Jackson" for DMARC)
> *Sent:* Friday, August 06, 2021 3:45 PM
> *To:* ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de; list, oracle
> *Subject:* RE: Statistics of the Oracle version used in percent
>
>
>
> Don’t know about the percentages, but, when I was a DBA and DBA manager,
> we upgraded for one (or more) of four reasons, usually in this order
>
> 1. There’s a bug fix we need
> 2. Lack of support (auditors love to jump on this one)
> 3. Cost of extended support (bean counters will jump on this)
> 4. There’s a new feature we need (or is required by an application)
>
>
>
> Clay Jackson
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org <oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org> *On
> Behalf Of *ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de
> *Sent:* Friday, August 6, 2021 12:18 PM
> *To:* list, oracle <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> *Subject:* Statistics of the Oracle version used in percent
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Is there a study that shows the percentage of used Oracle versions in
> 2021? Hopefully not influenced by the Oracle marketing team.
>
> I am also interested in knowing what motivates users to go to a new
> version. As well as what scares them to upgrade.
>
>
>
> Opinions from some experienced DBAs would be helpful.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ahmed
>
>
>
> 
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Aug 07 2021 - 00:30:59 CEST

Original text of this message