Re: amm vs. asmm
From: Andy Klock <andy_at_oracledepot.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:06:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CADo_RaPFiMEPbj2eO6L9b+fVmdo1uNK3+SAmyEL4z75VzJDhZg_at_mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:06:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CADo_RaPFiMEPbj2eO6L9b+fVmdo1uNK3+SAmyEL4z75VzJDhZg_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:41 PM ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de < ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de> wrote:
> The question: It is true that amm is not good (huge db, lot of sessions,
> parallels work)
> If I'm right how can I connvince the dba?
>
The biggest thing that comes to mind are that AMM and hugepages aren't compatible. If you are running on Linux and doing big things, I'd consider not being able to use hugepages to be a show stopper.
Andy K
REF: https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/UNXAR/appi_vlm.htm#UNXAR403
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jan 23 2020 - 19:06:33 CET