amm vs. asmm
From: <ahmed.fikri_at_t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 18:39:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1579801150774.8720505.2def884ac8ad507e4311b4d9c8e694634b00df7b_at_spica.telekom.de>
Hi,
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 18:39:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1579801150774.8720505.2def884ac8ad507e4311b4d9c8e694634b00df7b_at_spica.telekom.de>
Hi,
Coincidentally, I have seen in a productive DB that it is used AMM instead
of Asmm. I'm a developer with a bit of a dba knowledge. Our software uses a
huge db and does complex calculations.
In my experience, using amm we had only problems with other customers on
11g and 12c
In addition, I have read many articles, that recommend to use asmm instead
of amm.
The question: It is true that amm is not good (huge db, lot of sessions,
parallels work)
Thanks
The DBA is ready to use Asmm, but only if I convince him.
If I'm right how can I connvince the dba?
Gesendet mit der Telekom Mail App
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jan 23 2020 - 18:39:10 CET