Re: Index not used, instead there is filter operation with NLSSORT function

Thanks for all the answers, indeed after setting:

alter session set nls_sort = binary_ci;
 and below was neccessary
alter session set nls_comp = linguistic;

Oracle is not able to use index anymore and filter predicate for full table scan looks like this: 2 - filter(NLSSORT("FILEPATHHASH",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')=HEXTORAW('66') AND NLSSORT("FILEPATH",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')=HEXTORAW('97') )

I've trimmed hextoraw values to make response clear, what is surprising for me, in the sql plan from client app there is no HEXTORAW function. I've checked the bind values and it was of type :  VARCHAR2(2000) the column itself is :

FILEPATHHASH                              NOT NULL VARCHAR2(40 CHAR)

Reminder, client app plan filter operation is: 2 - filter((NLSSORT("FILEPATHHASH",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')=NLSSORT(:2,'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')))

Regards.
Greg

Od: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> Do: "oracle-l_at_freelists.org" <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>; Wysłane: 11:23 Środa 2019-10-02
Temat: Re: Index not used, instead there is filter operation with NLSSORT function

>
> I thought I had an example of this on my blog somewhere, but all I could find was a note about "nls based" indexes not behaving as nicely as they should - but there may be something there that you find useful: https://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2016/01/06/nls-mess/
>
> Regards
> Jonathan Lewis
>
> ________________________________________
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of Jonathan Lewis
> Sent: 02 October 2019 10:16
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: Index not used, instead there is filter operation with NLSSORT function
>
> It looks like the client has set:
>
> alter session set nls_sort = binary_ci;
> possibly with
> alter session set nls_comp = linguistic;
>
> This may mean you need an index on:
> (
> nlssort(filepathhash, 'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')
> )
>
> to get the same performance.
>
> Regards
> Jonathan Lewis
>
> ________________________________________
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of grzegorzof_at_interia.pl
> Sent: 02 October 2019 10:06
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Index not used, instead there is filter operation with NLSSORT function
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got interesting case on my 11.2.0.4 .
>
> When using sqlplus
>
> explain plan for delete from SENT where filePath='000103.zip' and filePathHash='ee76f6f'
>
> it is using index which is optimal :
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> | 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 1 | 192 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
>
> | 1 | DELETE | SENT | | | | |
>
> |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SENT | 1 | 192 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
>
> |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDXSENT_PATHHASH | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>
> 2 - filter("FILEPATH"='000103.zip')
>
> 3 - access("FILEPATHHASH"='ee76f6f')
>
>
>
> but when the same query is run by application user there is full table scan run on SENT table and no access predicate, only filter with NLSSORT function like this:
>
> 2 - filter((NLSSORT("FILEPATHHASH",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')=NLSSORT(:2,'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')))
>
>
> sqlplus session params:
>
> NLS_SORT = BINARY,
>
> NLS_COMP=BINARY
>
>
> I'm not sure what kind of nls setting application has, but obviously it is something not default and causing the optimizer to deny index access whenever possible,
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Regards.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l