Re: Looking for Suggestions - 5 TB DB WHSE Backup options

From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:14:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEueRAVdY3v_jCAz+bJPRo6TkSEwagxMCi4x4gkwLDzmZbP53w_at_mail.gmail.com>



Mladen, you'll be excited to learn that a new technology was recently released just within the last 32 years called network file system that allows you to mount a remote share to your local file system. You see, when you copy the file to the share the file still looks like it's on the local server, but don't let that fool you. It's actually on a different server that could be feet or even tens of feet away, even though it looks like it's on the local server...WHAT? You should see this bleeding edge technology become more popular as technologists start to learn about it.

Hey look at that. I can be sarcastic and talk down to people too.

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/18/2016 10:24 PM, Seth Miller wrote:
>
> I do them every day. Sometimes I use the FRA, sometimes I don't. It
> depends on the database requirements.
>
>
> Then you probably know that those backups are done with channels of device
> type disk. Regardless of whether you put them into FRA or not, those
> backups go to the local file system, on the database server. Again, the
> backup and the database are on the same server. Which was the point of my
> remark. For some curious reason that ultimately unimportant abbreviation
> got your full attention, but the issue of having the backup and the
> database on the same server did not. The world is a strange place.
>
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> Oracle DBA
> Tel: (347) 321-1217
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Jul 19 2016 - 05:14:25 CEST

Original text of this message