Re: Looking for Suggestions - 5 TB DB WHSE Backup options

From: Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:33:10 -0400
Message-ID: <7e54cd28-fadf-2d9e-bc45-883cfc153c1f_at_gmail.com>


On 07/18/2016 11:14 PM, Seth Miller wrote:
> Mladen, you'll be excited to learn that a new technology was recently
> released just within the last 32 years called network file system that
> allows you to mount a remote share to your local file system. You see,
> when you copy the file to the share the file still looks like it's on
> the local server, but don't let that fool you. It's actually on a
> different server that could be feet or even tens of feet away, even
> though it looks like it's on the local server...WHAT? You should see
> this bleeding edge technology become more popular as technologists
> start to learn about it.
>

Having the database and backup on the same server is fundamentally unsound, no matter how you spin it. Hopefully, you will not have to prove that your company is SOX or HIPAA compliant and explain the great news about NFS to Deloitte and Touche. That would be cruel. BTW, these days people normally don't use "servers" to serve NFS shares, these days people use NAS. And no, there was no private email exchange mentioning that abbreviation.

-- 
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Tel: (347) 321-1217

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Jul 19 2016 - 05:33:10 CEST

Original text of this message