Re: ACFS

You don’t happen to be using HANFS are you?

Kenny

> On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:05 PM, RajeevGM <rprabha01_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Kenny,
>
> We are using ACFS for the last few years on a two node 11.2.0.2 and
> a 11.2.0.3 RAC environment.
>
> Shutting down these mount points can be a pain at times if you have a tight maintenance window.
>
> Also, I recall facing some stability issues with them on 11.2.0.2 (Solaris platform),
> but, we were able to get past them and it was stable from that point onwards.
>
> On Solaris, we had to apply the patch 14617206 to address the issue of os commands hanging issue.
> -Rajeev
>

>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Anyone running ACFS with any scale?  I've ran it on a fairly small scale but nothing of any size.  I'm starting to look at it for 60-70T content share with 40-50 clients.  I'd rather expose it as NFS rather than install it on every client but looking for resiliency and clustering.  It seems to have all of the features I'll need ( ie. snapshot, replication and encryption ).
>> 
>> I can also break this 40-50T up into a good number of smaller chunks ( < 5T ) and could actually build multiple clusters as opposed to one large one.  Each cluster would present data to a subset of the clients.
>> 
>> Looking for success stories, horror stories or just words of enlightenment.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Kenny
>> 
>> 
>> 

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l