Re: ACFS
From: RajeevGM <rprabha01_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:38:09 -0400
Message-Id: <6E296E52-F516-431B-B9D1-8BC89F029D46_at_gmail.com>
No, we are not using hanfs.
>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:05 PM, RajeevGM <rprabha01_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Kenny,
>>
>> We are using ACFS for the last few years on a two node 11.2.0.2 and
>> a 11.2.0.3 RAC environment.
>>
>> Shutting down these mount points can be a pain at times if you have a tight maintenance window.
>>
>> Also, I recall facing some stability issues with them on 11.2.0.2 (Solaris platform),
>> but, we were able to get past them and it was stable from that point onwards.
>>
>> On Solaris, we had to apply the patch 14617206 to address the issue of os commands hanging issue.
>> -Rajeev
>>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:38:09 -0400
Message-Id: <6E296E52-F516-431B-B9D1-8BC89F029D46_at_gmail.com>
No, we are not using hanfs.
> On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Rajeev. > > You don’t happen to be using HANFS are you? > > Kenny > >
>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 4:05 PM, RajeevGM <rprabha01_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Kenny,
>>
>> We are using ACFS for the last few years on a two node 11.2.0.2 and
>> a 11.2.0.3 RAC environment.
>>
>> Shutting down these mount points can be a pain at times if you have a tight maintenance window.
>>
>> Also, I recall facing some stability issues with them on 11.2.0.2 (Solaris platform),
>> but, we were able to get past them and it was stable from that point onwards.
>>
>> On Solaris, we had to apply the patch 14617206 to address the issue of os commands hanging issue.
>> -Rajeev
>>
>>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone running ACFS with any scale? I've ran it on a fairly small scale but nothing of any size. I'm starting to look at it for 60-70T content share with 40-50 clients. I'd rather expose it as NFS rather than install it on every client but looking for resiliency and clustering. It seems to have all of the features I'll need ( ie. snapshot, replication and encryption ). >>> >>> I can also break this 40-50T up into a good number of smaller chunks ( < 5T ) and could actually build multiple clusters as opposed to one large one. Each cluster would present data to a subset of the clients. >>> >>> Looking for success stories, horror stories or just words of enlightenment. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kenny >
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Oct 20 2015 - 00:38:09 CEST