Re: ACFS

From: RajeevGM <rprabha01_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:05:50 -0400
Message-Id: <87E56349-3F80-4397-AAD4-BB8DACAA64A8_at_gmail.com>



Kenny,

We are using ACFS for the last few years on a two node 11.2.0.2 and a 11.2.0.3 RAC environment.

Shutting down these mount points can be a pain at times if you have a tight maintenance window.

Also, I recall facing some stability issues with them on 11.2.0.2 (Solaris platform), but, we were able to get past them and it was stable from that point onwards.

On Solaris, we had to apply the patch 14617206 to address the issue of os commands hanging issue. -Rajeev

> On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Anyone running ACFS with any scale? I've ran it on a fairly small scale but nothing of any size. I'm starting to look at it for 60-70T content share with 40-50 clients. I'd rather expose it as NFS rather than install it on every client but looking for resiliency and clustering. It seems to have all of the features I'll need ( ie. snapshot, replication and encryption ).
>
> I can also break this 40-50T up into a good number of smaller chunks ( < 5T ) and could actually build multiple clusters as opposed to one large one. Each cluster would present data to a subset of the clients.
>
> Looking for success stories, horror stories or just words of enlightenment.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kenny
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Oct 19 2015 - 22:05:50 CEST

Original text of this message