Re: CRS license (No RAC)

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:25:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sY7LAYTxO_QTORgxXA8pGuB5NfOnvSxBhhMnZj9w-T8UA_at_mail.gmail.com>

I'd have thought ASM had enough advantages myself. On 15 Jul 2014 18:28, "Justin Mungal" <justin_at_n0de.ws> wrote:

> What's your plan? Just wanting to learn GI itself?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Nadeem M. Khan <nadeem.m.khan_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your insights. I'll pursue this further with Oracle. I
>> can go without CRS as this is not a production environment and see no
>> significant advantages in using CRS without RAC.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For any Oracle licensing questions, you should ask Oracle. Any answers
>>> you get here are unofficial.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Suse Shi <sinosuse_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes simply it's free, (No extra license) if the upper apps/db are of
>>>> oracle products.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -suse
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-07-15 16:55 GMT+08:00 Nadeem M. Khan <nadeem.m.khan_at_gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, If I want to install 11g on RHEL single node with CRS, would I need
>>>>> a RAC license? I do not intend to use RAC and will set it to off.
>>>>>
>>>>> This isn't One Node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -suse
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew W. Kerber
>>>
>>> 'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
>>>
>>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Jul 15 2014 - 20:25:48 CEST