Re: Database comparisons

From: Nuno Souto <>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:11:15 +1100
Message-ID: <>

Jared Still wrote,on my timestamp of 12/01/2010 2:31 PM:

> The point is that there are 200 tables, so how do you verify that
> somehow the new features didn't make a change to another table that
> you assumed wasn't touched by the tests.

Couldn't just turning the monitoring on for those tables resolve the issue? All the auditor wants to know is if the tables got changed, not by how much and where. Together with verifying last_ddl from dba_objects, that would solve the problem?

Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
Received on Tue Jan 12 2010 - 05:11:15 CST

Original text of this message