Re: Clusterware tests

From: Alessandro Vercelli <>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:25:50 +0200
Message-Id: <KQWM32$>

Prior version (10gR2) of White Paper (somewhere still available on the net) showed also an OCFS choice.


>I don't believe the OP is building a RAC database from the description,
>could be wrong. It sounds like Oracle Clusterware (free) being used to make
>Oracle database (single instance) fault tolerant. ASM is a requirement for
>SE RAC. In principle I'd imagine some other shared storage solution (nfs)
>might be usable for the setup the OP describes. The white paper of course
>uses ASM.
>On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Zito <> wrote:
>> Am I mistaken, or isn't ASM a requirement for standard edition?
>> Matt

Received on Fri Oct 02 2009 - 15:25:50 CDT

Original text of this message