Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

Re: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala_at_verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:14:28 -0400
Message-id: <1158743668l.2924l.0l@medo.noip.com>

On 09/20/2006 05:01:24 AM, Laimutis Nedzinskas wrote:
> If this is not acceptable then I agree that you have to train to do upgrades
> with standby in place. But otherwise keep it simple is a good rule.

The rule is actually "keep it as simple as possible, but not simpler". If the database cannot go down, you need to activate the standby while doing upgrades.

-- 
Mladen Gogala
http://www.mgogala.com

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Sep 20 2006 - 04:14:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US