Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 24 with name "_SYSSMU24$" too small

Re: ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 24 with name "_SYSSMU24$" too small

From: Alex Gorbachev <gorbyx_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:11:41 +0200
Message-ID: <c2213f680606271311i7e2089c6n884178cf13b5fc66@mail.gmail.com>


My respect if you can have terrabyte OLTP system running stable with auto gather stats job. Quite challenging. :)

If you have bug # - please share.
Stats gathering doesn't do "massive DML". What it does is a lot of selects and assuming those are long running, one can expect it to fail with ORA-1555 on a busy OLTP system. The only DMLs are done to dictionary tables to update stats (unless I seriously missing something). Invalidation of execution plans caused by updating statistics should have far more noticeable impact I believe.

2006/6/27, Wittenmyer Joel - CO <WITTENMYERJ_at_tusc.com>:
> This sounds similar to a known bug with ASSM tablespaces. The stats job
> updates tables in SYSAUX. Those tables have indexes and up to 10.2.0.2 if
> an instance does massive DML (which the stats job does in our case.
> Terabyte oltp with daily data loads and many schemas) on segments in an ASSM
> tablespace that has indexes, the undo is unbelievable. In our case it
> produces 10x the undo / redo it normally would. It can cause not only
> ora-1555, but you can blow out the max extents (32767) for an undo segment.
> The 'workaround' of coalescing the indexes prior to running such DML is only
> minimally effective. The backport patch for previous versions in some cases
> flat doesn't work (I know from experience.) The only sure fix is to upgrade
> to 10.2.0.2, which I am told definitely fixes the issue, and which I am
> preparing to do on several production instances even thought I HATE applying
> the latest patchset (hornet's nest). Of course, if you are already on
> 10.2.0.2 and are seeing this, please let me know!

-- 
Best regards,
Alex Gorbachev

http://blog.oracloid.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Jun 27 2006 - 15:11:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US