Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> normalization

normalization

From: Chris Stephens <cstephens16_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:25:19 -0400
Message-ID: <d95e86070511011025t18b7a40ga275908d4b492beb@mail.gmail.com>


There is a discussion going on at work concerning calculated fields.

I am claiming that any calculated field in a table is a violation of at least 3NF if not 2NF. I can find all sorts of references on the web that justify my position but nothing that directly says this violates normalization rules.

The person who i disagree with is claiming that 'technically', calculated fields do not violate 3NF. They are just not recommended. I am unable to find anything on the web coinciding with this argument.

Anyone know of a site with a direct statement that calcualted fields violate 2NF/3NF?

thanks,
chris

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:28:19 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US