RE: Patch 9.2.07 for Linux

Chris,  

I agree with you. Not to mention that some of the new "features" they have added are things I don't need right now. So why go to a new release just to fight through the bugs for a software release that might be troublesome for features I currently don't need?  

Tom    

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Marquez, Chris Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 12:52 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: Patch 9.2.07 for Linux  

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of Kevin Closson
>> Now, kudos to anyone that can guess the Oracle's master plan
>> behind not porting 9i to Solx86... I know ...

"STOCK Price" and "sales projections".
A sale of 9i does not indicate growth while a sale of 10g does.  ;o)

|| -----Original Message-----
|| From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of M Rafiq
|| evidence can be seen just after release of patchset
|| under known bugs introduce by new patchset.
|| 9206 was the worst example.

Oracle Corp., my co-DBA's, my client, my boss, have to *force* me to change Oracle versions.
I will gladly run 9205 until some act makes me change it, "new" and "potential security hole" is not a good enough reason for me to chagne anything.

I would have gladly stayed on 7.3.4.5 and 8.1.7.4 until I was told to get off.

"If it is not broke...don't fix it"

Chris Marquez
Oracle DBA

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l