Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: CTX Indexes

RE: CTX Indexes

From: <Peter.Hitchman_at_thomson.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:41:43 +0100
Message-ID: <3D730671F3FB8C4EA73FD2E94A11F94703AF33@tshuklonmbx02.ERF.THOMSON.COM>

Hi,
You need to run RESYNC_INDEX so that inserts and updates are reflected = in the index. So how often and when you run this depends on your = application. For the one I worked on the system was a kind of backend = data mart so I had the RESYNC happening as part of the loading process, = which was a regular batch process.

As the index is updated for DML it becomes fragmented, since what is = doing is storing what terms are in what indexes and in common with other = text search engines, Oracle does not try to optimize the storage of this = information on the fly, that is just too expensive. So to fix this you use the OPTIMIZE_INDEX procedure. This has a few = options about how aggressive you want it to be. As with most other = things, how and how often you run this will depend on your application.

I recommend the Oracle Notes on MetaLink:- = 120609.1,120610.1,120611.1,104262.1,150307.1,221940.1 and anything else = written by Roger Ford.

Regards

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
[mailto:Thomas.Mercadante_at_labor.state.ny.us] Sent: 25 May 2005 16:04
To: Hitchman, Peter (TS UK); oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: RE: CTX Indexes

Peter,

Speaking of CTX_DDL.OPTIMIZE_INDEX, do you remember if I should run that procedure regularly or CTX_DDL.RESYNC_INDEX? Should I run them both?

Thanks

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Peter.Hitchman_at_thomson.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 9:53 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: CTX Indexes

Hi,
Well it has been a while, but back in 8.1.7 Oracle changed things so =3D that the analyze did nothing, it only recorded the fact that it had been
=3D

run. The optimization method was changed to so that it was carried out =
=3D

at query time to find the token document count.

The object owned by ctxsys were not analyzed, but the =3D dr$<your_index_name>$I etc objects created in the application schema =3D that owned the text indices were analyzed. As well as a regular =3D CTX_DDL.OPTIMIZE_INDEX. Regards

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
Sent: 25 May 2005 13:00
To: oracle-l
Subject: CTX Indexes

All,
=3D20

We are just creating CTX type indexes for the first time and I have a couple of questions.

=3D20

I know that I need to periodically resync the indexes using the Ctx_ddl package. We plan on doing this nightly for now until the apps folks tell us it needs to be done more often.

=3D20

I also tried to gather stats on the index, but the stats columns in the user_indexes view did not get updated. Is gathering stats on ctx type indexes a waste of time? Should I be gathering stats on some CTX tables instead - like the DR$INDEX_VALUE table where all of the data from the column is actually stored (this is a big assumption on my part)?

=3D20

Thanks

Tom

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed May 25 2005 - 11:46:00 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US