Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: dataguard = Rac and/or Standby for 10G

Re: dataguard = Rac and/or Standby for 10G

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:39:43 +0100
Message-ID: <7765c897040910033931ab05eb@mail.gmail.com>


On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:12:19 -0500, Duret, Kathy <kduret_at_starkinvestments.com> wrote:
> Is anyone using Dataguard? Is it worth the extra $$.

Extra $$ compared to what? If you have already bought EE - as others have said - then I would definitely go with DG. If you are considering buying EE - "just for" DataGuard *and just to provide a standby database* then I'm on record as saying it probably isn't worth it. Manual standby works just as well as it ever did.

Where DataGuard (9i+) scores is in the following areas.

  1. Ease of administration.
  2. Supportability (try talking to a support analyst about manual standby its harder than you might expect).
  3. Flexibility. Try doing 5 different standby locations manually.

It also ought to score in the area of logical standby - but I haven't used that and in a survey of about 200 or so people at a SIG at which I was presenting i could only find one user of Logical Standby.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
--
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org&subject=unsubscribe 
To search the archives - http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
Received on Fri Sep 10 2004 - 05:35:14 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US