- Michael Thomas <mhthomas_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Very helpful, thanks. This definately adds scope to
> the definition of "pre-approved" and now (a little
> slow) I understand why you are collecting input.
>
> Those going through this process deserve sympathy.
> Its
> surely tough to setup or make major changes to
> structured processes. Good luck.
>
> The SOX is new to me, so I am confused by its
> relation
> to other structured processes. It seems to involve a
> wide variety of concerns including financials,
> security, audit, etc. It would take some 'hands-on'
> for me to better understand what everyone is going
> through with an audit. So, I will be paying close
> attention. Thanks for the suggestions.
>
> Maybe someone can start a new thead later about
> audit
> experiences and corrective actions taken once things
> were sorted out. Its much better to share and learn
> about the challenges here, than when facing an
> auditor!
>
> Have a great weekend.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike Thomas
Hi Mike,
been there. audit by a big 6 firm, client's accounting
system. at least I got to run the scripts first,
survey the output, test corrective actions against
their test database, wait a few days, apply fixes to
prod, re-run auditing scripts.
let me know if you're interested.
Paul
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
http://www.orafaq.com
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Jun 18 2004 - 15:46:07 CDT
