Re: Speeding up Oracle application db patching

From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:30:18 +0300
Message-ID: <046c01c42d5f$9f71b9b0$28a423d5@porgand>

Hi!

I think you should start with other methods for reducing the downtime, like patch merging etc..

I wouldn't want to mention those parameters here since they're very dangerous if any crash should happen and you need recovery. There are lots of people who just try any parameters they see in internet to make their system go faster, without caring about the implications of these at all...

Anyway, go check my paper about reducing 11i upgrade downtime from http://integrid.info and you'll find them there...

Tanel.

Original Message ----- From: <fpayne_at_adelphia.net> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:20 PM Subject: Speeding up Oracle application db patching

> Some time ago there were some posts that addressed
> speeding up Oracle application db patching with
> some init.ora parameters. A recent practice run of
> a 11.5.8 upgrade database patch on our system ran for
> 12hours. I tried to look in the archive but didn't
> have any luck, does anyone recall those postings
> and can you pass that info on to me?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed Apr 28 2004 - 15:27:33 CDT